14 October 2008
10 Oct
Andrew Krystal, perhaps the most straightforward talk-radio host in Atlantic Canada, spent this morning taking Steve Murphy and the ATV newsroom to task for their airing of Stephane Dion’s fumbling of an economic question during a taped interview.
Krystal’s criticism? That leaders fumble all the time in interviews, and many reporters (keen to have lucid answers) will give the politician the chance to call a mulligan. Harper himself had to use a mulligan when conducting an interview with Krystal over Iraq a few years back – because the interview was taped, the talk radio gave the conservative leader a chance to do a do-over.
Murphy gave Dion this chance, but then decided that having a leader stumble over the verb tense in a single question was more news-worthy than having a lucid discussion on economic matters. This shows either poor news judgement on Murphy’s part, or an implicit conservative bias (in his memoirs, Murphy regales in telling the reader how hard he was on John Turner during the 1988 election campaign).
Let’s be clear. Dion’s fumble is in no way an indication of his ability to handle the current economic crisis. This was not at all like Sarah Palin’s incomprehension over the Bush doctrine, or suggestions that close proximity to Russia made here an expert in Foreign Policy. It was a linguistic fumble, and offered no glimpse as to the Liberal leader’s economic thinking. Perhaps Dion would have satisfied Murphy if he took a page from Harper’s playbook and simply stated, “If I were Prime Minister today, I would tell all Canadians to buy Nortel. It’s a bargain!”
Alas, Dion didn’t choose to play stockpicker. And in turn, the ATV newsroom didn’t choose to be impartial.

Conservative Party
Liberal Party
New Democratic Party
Bloc Québécois
Green Party
Christian Heritage
Progressive Canadian
Marijuana Party
Marxist-Leninist Party
Canadian Action Party
Communist Party
Libertarian Party
First Peoples Party
Western Block Party
Animal Alliance Party
neorhino.ca
12 Responses for "Steve Murphy, Conservative Partisan?"
You wrote: “Dion’s fumble is in no way an indication of his ability to handle the current economic crisis” and ” offered no glimpse as to the Liberal leader’s economic thinking. ”
True. The problem is we don’t know whether he has the ability or not because during the course of the campaign he has never explained what his ability or thinking is. Does he have any economic or financial experience or knowledge? Has he ever handled a crisis situation?
I agree with the writer. CTV, Mike Duffy, and Steve Murphy also showed their true blue colours – as if any of us had been in any doubt of them before. This is twice in as many days that accusations of a lack of “journalistic integrity” by a CTV reporter have been justifiably made. (Elizabeth May had a run-in with Duffy on Wednesday and made such accusation on air.)
Harper only showed his mean bully streak by making fun of a situation caused by the combination of a hearing impediment, a desire to understand the tense of a question put not in a second language, and trust that the out-takes would not be aired.
I’m disgusted with CTV. Living out west, and the media monopoly of CanWest, I’m not surprised though. I long ago removed any links to all CanWest media under my Web news sources. Don’t have a TV, but if I did, would never watch their programs either.
Well who is surprised that Duffy and Murphy they both have been true blue. What ever the outcome of the election Duffy and Murphy are just the surface of the problem with news people in Canada trying to be attack dogs the good side of it most Canadians are above it.
Oh the outrage!
Dion has been in Ottawa well over 15 years. English may still not be his strong suit but what of his policy communications ability? Not very strong.
Dion had four, FOUR restarts on the interview with CTV Halifax (only 2 agreed upon) and his campaign aide also whispered the relevent words in his ear. Dion DID understand the question because he started to answer it with the gobbeldegoop 50/30 or 30/50 answer which is actually his Kyoto/anti-poverty policy! Then he corrected himself with the 30 day plan thingy. Hey nobody brought out a Barney the Dinosaur like the Libs did in 2000 to ridicule the opposition leader of the day. Liberals and reporters and news anchors ridiculed mercifully for days. Har har har. Gee it’s funny how that works. Now we are mean because Dion is hard of hearing (in a crowd), or isn’t great with English or his feelings were hurt, or he wasn’t given a teleprompter. Yeah he’d be a great representative at a WTO meeting or a NATO meeting or during a global economic meltdown. Forget the PC apologies. Whay do you really think?
Steve Murphy saw a chance to get it a little national attention and it was too much for him to resist. It’s unfortunate that he wasn’t able to keep his word to Mr. Dion about not broadcasting the outtakes, but that tells us far more about Murphy’s ethics than it does about Dion’s aptitude for the job of Prime Minister. I guess the question now becomes “who will ever trust Steve Murphy again to live up to his word when he thinks that it gain him some national press attention”? Too bad – he’s just another hack.
I’m with Ms. Ocean on this one. Out here there is only Global, and they weave Conservative endoresments into everything they do. CTV though did not have to, they chose to be low and dirty in their tactics, and I doubt they would do the same to Harper. This is a bit like those papparzzi photos that are taken of stars with out their makeup, while they are in old dirty track pants, taking out their garbage or something.
English is my 1st language and I have to say if someone asked me in French the equivalent of “if you became PM now, what would you have done already for the economy?”, yes, I would look confused and need some clarification.
I also agree with the writer but would offer this caveat…Steve Murphy is a good journalist and a decent human being. He’s been through this sort of thing before, as have many of us.
This was more about ratings and not so much about politics.
For sure, it wasn’t about journalism.
Shameful really.
http://www.reedwrites.ca
Steve Murphy’s conservative bias has been evident to me for a long time. But this takes the cake. He should be fired and replaced with a journalist who takes neutrality seriously. We don’t need anchorpersons cheerleading for a political party, unless CTV aspires to become Fox of the north.
What makes all of you so sure that it was Steve Murphy’s decision to play–or not to play–the now infamous interview as is?
Steve Murphy has been gunning for Lloyd Robertson or Mike Duffy for years. He wants a national profile and this was his way of getting one.
The new hairdo, the laser eye surgery (anyone remember when he use to wear glasses that would rival Bubbles’). Steve is one Duffy heart attack away from a daily spot on Newsnet, or one heartbeat away from the big chair.
I cannot believe that Steve is getting so much grief! He is a household name and someone we have supper with every night. Who said it was his decision to air it anyway? Regardless, people make mistakes. Our kids make mistakes. We forgive them and move on don’t we? Were we not taught to be upset with the action not the person?
Steve- YOU “be well”…
It certainly was NOT Steve Murphy’s decision to air the re-takes…nor was it his producer’s decision. It was management’s decision folks.
And to say that Steve was gunning for Robertson’s job…well that’s just bullcrap.
http://www.reedwrites.ca/2008/10/ctv-humilates-a.html
Leave a reply below or start a thread in the discussion forums
Note: Sometimes people try to portray more support for their candidate or their perspective in the comments section by posing as different people. If you attempt to do this, we will delete all of your comments.Update: despite the above warning, people are attempting to use multiple aliases, so we are now moderating all comments to check against possible abuses. We apologize for this inconvenience, however we will work to get comments posted as soon as possible.