14 October 2008
8 Oct
Reprinted with permission from Fair Vote Canada.
Open letter from Fair Vote Canada to strategic voters and vote-swappers
“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.†– Albert Einstein
Another federal election and another disaster for democracy.On October 14, millions of Canadians – possibly eight million – will become orphan voters, casting ballots that send no one to Ottawa. As usual, the election results will be wildly distorted.
Some parties will get a portion of seats far exceeding their portion of the popular vote, while others will get too little or none at all.We may even see a party opposed by six voters in every ten take majority control in the House of Commons.
Why we call this exercise “democracy†is a continuing mystery.
During every election in recent memory the frustration created by an undemocratic electoral system leads some to conclude that voters should try to “game†the system. Instead of marking the ballot for a party you support, they say, be “smart†and vote for a party you do not support in order block another party that you despise.
A recent poll by the Toronto Star indicated that about half of those supporting the Liberals, NDP and Green Party would consider casting a negative or “strategic†vote, abandoning the party they actually prefer, to vote for another party in the hope of stopping a candidate from the front-running Conservatives.
In addition to 40% of the eligible voters who choose not to vote we could now have another large group of people who have given up on sincere voting and genuine democratic representation.
This is no way to nourish pride of citizenship or public respect for the laws that emanate from an unrepresentative Parliament.
Citizens in most major democracies take for granted their right to cast a vote that elects the representation they want. In the upcoming election, the majority of Canadian voters will all but certainly be denied that right.Fair Vote Canada cannot advise voters whether to cast negative votes or to participate in vote-swapping schemes on October 14. It’s rarely a clear or easy choice.
What we can advise is that all Canadians should be coming together to demand reform of our country’s undemocratic election process.
If you have not already done so, join and support Fair Vote Canada. Sign the Fair Vote Canada petition calling for a national referendum on electoral reform. Urge other organizations to make active citizenship, equal votes and proportional representation for all Canadians a part of their basic mission.
Together we can win.
British Columbians showed the way in 2005 when 58% voted by referendum for proportional representation, only to be frustrated – in the short-term – by an undemocratic government-imposed threshold of 60%. On May 12, 2009, British Columbians will vote again in an electoral reform referendum. With our encouragement and help, they can lead Canada on the path of democratic renewal.
The electoral system has orphaned many of us. We must refuse to be silenced. Democracy has been long delayed, but if democrats are steadfast, democracy will not be forever denied.
Fair Vote Canada
Orphan Voters
Please help spread the word about the importance of reforming our electoral system – distribute this letter widely. – Ocean.

Conservative Party
Liberal Party
New Democratic Party
Bloc Québécois
Green Party
Christian Heritage
Progressive Canadian
Marijuana Party
Marxist-Leninist Party
Canadian Action Party
Communist Party
Libertarian Party
First Peoples Party
Western Block Party
Animal Alliance Party
neorhino.ca
7 Responses for "Fair Vote Canada: Open letter to strategic voters"
First of all, I’d like to state that I am entirely in favour of proportional representation in one form or another to better represent the diversity of voices that express themselves during each election.
That being said, the current movement of strategic voting against the Conservatives that I have been observing during this election is very disturbing. It is nothing short of a perversion of our electoral system and another case of a minority group believing that they know better than the majority that surrounds them.
If you really think that the Liberals, NDP and Green parties are the same thing and are just splitting the leftist vote, take it up with the parties and convince them to merge. If you “despise” the Conservatives so much that you are willing to forego supporting “your” party, whatever that may be, then maybe your political convictions aren’t as strong as you believe they are.
I’ve voted for a variety of parties in the past, and would probably vote Green if we had proportional representation. I’ve always voted for the candidate that I thought best represented the riding. On the occasion where I haven’t “won my elections”, I’ve respected the decision of those around me.
I’ve heard talk of “voting with your conscience” to prevent the Conservatives from gaining a majority. I encourage everyone to vote with their conscience and actually support the party they believe in.
Just wondering why this letter is addressed to strategic voters (and vote swappers)? Doesn’t it apply equally to people voting for the party they most support, but with no expectation that their vote will matter?
Fair Vote Canada only supports proportional representation, which is hardly the only electoral reform we require (representation by population at the constituency level and an elected Senate are two that come to mind). PR would result in a permanent minority government, which our system is not designed for, and will lead to endless election posturing instead of government. Far from being more democratic, it will result in small parties wielding inordinate power in any coalition. Israel and Italy provide examples of the instability created and power small parties hold in a PR system. Thanks, but no thanks.
As a supporter of Proportional Representation, I do agree that something needs to be done to get rid of our rotten First-Past-The-Post electoral system. Strategic voting may pain me, but I also understand that under this system, it will happen, and at least it shows that people are starting to understand how the system functions. People who are “holding their nose” and voting for their 2nd or 3rd choice to defeat the party they dislike most may end up being the very ones who help finally change the system. After all, each time you do it, it rubs you the wrong way. If people get the impression that somehow the voting system could be made a lot better, a lot more representative, that’s because it could.
Waysl, I’m sure you would agree that New Zealand, Scotland, and Wales all have systems which are extremely similar to the Canadian system as they are all modeled on the British system.
Well all three of those places have moved to proportional representation quite a few years ago and it’s worked so well that none of them are moving back.
PR is only one of a number of possible systems that would serve Canada better than FPTP. Mixed-member PR was rejected in Ontario last year, but it was reform’s first kick at the can and it may still have life. BC is going to be voting on a Single Transferable Vote system, which is also much more democratic in my opinion.
FPTP was never meant to work in a true multi-party system. Strategic voting is a means to cope with the systemic perversion that citizens now have to deal with.
Also, I don’t think Fair Vote Canada is against reforming the Senate – they are probably for it. My personal inclination is that the Senate needs reforms too. The big blockage there is getting people (parties, provincial governments) to agree on what form it should take. A referendum on it would be a given. I don’t think such changes in Canada can be legitimately done without one anymore.
Leave a reply below or start a thread in the discussion forums
Note: Sometimes people try to portray more support for their candidate or their perspective in the comments section by posing as different people. If you attempt to do this, we will delete all of your comments.Update: despite the above warning, people are attempting to use multiple aliases, so we are now moderating all comments to check against possible abuses. We apologize for this inconvenience, however we will work to get comments posted as soon as possible.