14 October 2008
22 Sep
This post has been crossposted to my blog.
I have been asked to blog at Democratic Space as part of their coverage of the 2008 campaign. My goal is to provide a eye to the campaign from my corner of the world, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo.
The Region of Waterloo takes in the cities of Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge, along with the rural townships of North Dumfries, Wilmot, Wellesley and Woolwich. Its urban areas are a hotbed of manufacturing and high tech industry and the area leads the province in having one of the lowest levels of unemployment. The Perimeter Institute, two universities and Conestoga College make this a strong academic centre as well, with Waterloo being named as one of the “most intelligent†cities in the world. And yet, the rural townships with their Mennonite communities, still have an influence in the character of the cities. We don’t have to drive far for countryside, and we are still known for our farms and food processing. Oh, and we have the largest Oktoberfest in the western hemisphere.
In 2004, the region passed a small milestone when the sprawling riding of Waterloo-Wellington was cut back to the region’s borders, forming the riding that would become Kitchener-Conestoga. This move gave the region four distinct ridings — the same as Prince Edward Island, the smallest province in Confederation (even though Waterloo Region has four times the population). It’s a small point, but it highlights the region’s growing sense of self — almost a provincialist sense of self, here.
Currently, the four ridings are split between two Liberals and two Conservatives. The two Liberals reside in Kitchener Centre (Karen Redman) and Kitchener-Waterloo (Andrew Telegdi) while the Conservatives reside in urban Cambridge (Gary Goodyear) and very rural Kitchener-Conestoga (Harold Albrecht). Waterloo Region would seem to embody the urban-rural political split that exists in the rest of the country. I would be very surprised if any riding changed hands this election, as only Cambridge is in any way competitive for the incumbent.

Kitchener Centre in particular can be considered one of the safer Liberal seats in the country. For the past fifteen years, the New Democrats have always run a spirited campaign for the riding, they’ve always run good candidates, they’ve always generated buzz, and they’ve always finished third. I believe, from experience, that there is a large group of voters in Kitchener-Waterloo, who don’t get excited about politics, who don’t campaign or put up lawn signs, but who in the end go down to the polling stations and vote Liberal. I also believe that the second largest group of people in Kitchener-Waterloo have come to accept this. They don’t get excited about politics; they don’t campaign or put up lawn signs either, but at the end of the day, they go down to the polling stations and vote Conservative. That explains the voting patterns I’ve seen since moving here.
So, if the Liberals lose Kitchener Centre, you can rest assured that the party is in trouble.
The current campaign has been pretty quiet. Stephen Harper came through here the other day, and it was barely talked about. Karen Redman was late in putting up her campaign signs, but experience tells me that this doesn’t matter. Here is a list of who’s running:
Karen Redman, 55 (Liberal): Karen Redman has represented the riding of Kitchener Centre for eleven years, taking over from Liberal MP John English, who retired from politics. Before that, she has experience on municipal council. She is not been a very visible MP, and has been criticized by commentators on this blog for being little more than a party voice box, but she has maintained her political relationships in this riding, and has a general aura of being a capable individual, well suited to being the MP. She has introduced a number of private members bills in parliament.
Stephen Woodworth, 54 (Conservative): Stephen Woodworth has been a lawyer for twenty-eight years. He served as a school trustee from 1994 to 2003 and is happily married. There’s not much to go on from his rather anaemic biography, and strangely enough his website doesn’t even mention Harper’s visit to Kitchener. The bulk of his campaign’s news releases has contrasted Karen Redman’s positions to that of her leader Stephane Dion, but offers little else. His signs are going up in the riding, and he seems a nice guy, but we don’t get a good sense of who he is and why he should be the riding’s MP. Anaemic, as I said.
Oz Cole-Arnal (New Democrats): Oscar Cole-Arnal is a name I haven’t heard before, but he’s carrying the NDP’s banner in Kitchener Centre. He’s a 67-year-old Lutheran minister who taught at Wilfred Laurier University. He calls himself “a passionate activist for racial, ethnic, gender, trade union, environmental and class justice,†and remembers where he was when Martin Luther King was shot. Though he doesn’t have the name recognition (at least for me) as riding president Richard Walsh-Bowers did, he may make some noise in this campaign. Intriguingly, he’s on Facebook and has a blog.
John Bithell, 32 (Greens): This manager from an auto parts company has thrown his hat into the ring for the Green Party, which I would think is an odd combination, unless he’s hoping his plant’s parts will be used for green vehicles. He’s also been involved in the region’s Food Bank and is a founding member of the Speakers Bureau, which “gives John the chance to go out into the community on a regular basis and speak to diverse groups such as schools, local businesses, and community organizations, and deliver the message of the Food Bank of Waterloo Regionâ€. Unfortunately, other than what the Greens can offer, his web presence is rather sketchy.
So, what do you think of immigration, John? As of September 23, this website says he believes: “Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Nulla arcu libero, gravida et, mollis ac, imperdiet eu, felis. Pellentesque convallis nisl sit amet libero. Phasellus augue.†Which I believe means that he’s all for it, especially from Latin American countries.
Amanda Lamka (Independent): Running on her own, according to Pundit’s Guide is Amanda Lamka. It’s proven rather difficult to find out who she is or what she stands for (her Facebook page can’t be viewed without her approval), but you see her name appear in social justice circles
The campaign may be heated elsewhere, but not here. The lawn signs are going up; all four parties are represented, and nobody has even tried to knock a sign down, as far as I can see. Even in the next riding over, you can see more signs of election vandalism as some campaign workers get more heated. And we’ll cover those ridings next time, starting for the race in Kitchener-Waterloo.

Conservative Party
Liberal Party
New Democratic Party
Bloc Québécois
Green Party
Christian Heritage
Progressive Canadian
Marijuana Party
Marxist-Leninist Party
Canadian Action Party
Communist Party
Libertarian Party
First Peoples Party
Western Block Party
Animal Alliance Party
neorhino.ca
7 Responses for "Waterloo Region Votes 2008 – Part 1: Kitchener Centre"
You (and his bio, understandably) neglected to mention that Woodworth ran for the federal Liberals next door in 1988. The break being over abortion-rights issues, etc.
James Bow, will you be attending the local candidates’ forum in the riding of Kitchener–Waterloo tonight?
Unfortunately not. Kids at home, et cetera.
I was able to attend the candidates forum this evening, and was quite impressed with a couple of the candidates. Most had their party platforms memorized very well. Actually there was a lot of intelligent discussion which was good. However, it did devolve at times into blue versus red! It is annoying how these two parties continually attack one another. Although it seems that these days most parties use these tactics.
A great event, that really allowed me to get to know my candidates. If you have the opportunity to attend your ridings candidates forum, I urge you to go!
Which candidates most impressed you, Ian, and why?
I attended the first hour of the event. The room was woefully undersized – I know that RIM Park has gymnasiums available and I think they should have chosen one of those.
The CAP candidate, a university student, was well-spoken and complimentary to most of the other candidates, but his main plan (for the government to loan itself money at a sub-market interest rate instead of borrowing from mostly foreign companies on the open market) struck me as a modern version of the old Social Credit print-worthless-money scheme. I got the impression he was there to raise some ideas and wasn’t fooling himself that he had any hope of winning.
The Communist candidate had some trouble expressing himself well in English, or at least my companions and I had trouble understanding him, but he got across his main ideas that free trade is bad and “we need jobs, we need food”.
Telegdi, the Liberal incumbant, Braid, the Conservative, and MacLellan, the Green, expressed their own positions and party positions well. Telegdi misspoke in his closing statements, saying that something he and the Green had in common was the goal of “getting Stephen Harper elected prime minister”. Obviously he either meant to say Stephane Dion or else stopping Harper from being prime minister. It was funny, but caused a disproportionately intense reaction among the crowd. The other candidates ignored it, except for Braid, who said, at the start of his closing statements, that he was glad to see he picked up a new vote.
I wasn’t impressed with the NDP candidate, Jacobsen. During his opening statement, the Conservative candidate mentioned his wife and daughters and also Harper. I was worried that he would continue mentioning his family as a selling point throughout the debate and also making the case that we should vote for him because Harper is so great. Instead, he didn’t mention his family again and didn’t excessively mention Harper, but Jacobsen referred to herself as a “pastor and a counsellor (and a mother)” in every answer, and played up how great Jack Layton is. After a few times, my companions and I would repeat the mantra “pastor and counsellor” under our breath when she said it and ask each other “What is her job? Did she say? Is she a mother?” Her tone seemed overly calm and too soothing, very pastor. One of my companions called it patronizing, as if we were her Sunday schoolers.
Many of these observations are superficial, but they are my impressions of the forum.
A lot of Don’s impressions mirror my own.
It was a great method to get to know the candidates, but the size of the room must have been very distracting for the hundred or more voters that had to stand at the back of the room.
I actually stayed for the full 2 hours to listen to more questions from the floor (though that number was small due to a very slow forum).
As for candidates, I was most impressed with three. These are in NO PARTICULAR ORDER OF MY PREFERENCE.
Andrew Telegdi, the Liberal incumbent was very knowledgable (as I would hope he would be, having been in parliament since 1997), and comfortable. However, I felt he failed to adequately give details into the party policies, just giving generalized answers and referring to their web content outlining their policy. I believe it was probably due to time constraints during the answer period, but I felt slightly unsatisfied. Having said this it is easy to understand why he has been successful thus far in his numerous campaigns.
I was moderately impressed.
The Green candidate, Cathy MacLellan impressed me greatly. I was a little surprised by me reaction. She was very thorough in her explanations, as long as time allowed, and was very passionate on what she spoke. She continually discussed both the Green’s platform, AND her priorities for the riding, which spoke to the main issues here. She is also a very intelligent woman, and I believe that if Green popularity continues to increase over the next many elections, she would be a very successful MP.
The Canadian Action Party candidate, Kyle Huntingdon actually impressed me as well. He is young, yes, but very concerned with the direction of our nation and of the riding as well. He did speak a fair bit on monetary reform, but then that is what the party was founded on. However, he was also extremely knowledgable regarding the other issues facing us. To a point at which it was difficult to see who had more knowledge among the stronger of the candidates. Having said this, there was one questions, I believe regarding the North American Union (some call it a conspiracy theory) in which he candidly admitted having very little information about, but then continued to discuss party policy in terms of a free and independent Canada. It was refreshing to have someone not afraid to say they didn’t have the full knowledge.
As for the other candidates, Peter Braid, the Conservative representative, did a fair job in defending the conservative action over the last two years, and in citing where we are going. There were many chuckles at his ridiculous statement regarding global warming greenhouse gas emissions to 50% of the current rate by 2050. Everyone in the room, but him, realizes that 42 years from now is too late to really bring in strong measures. However, this is his parties plan and not his own, so I do recognize that he is stating party policy. He did mention his family a fair bit, and certainly mentioned Harper a lot, although the other candidates of course attacked Harper’s history of choices and policy.
The NDP candidate, Cindy Jacobsen, disappointed me a fair bit. She seems like a very considerate, and caring individual, but the amount of references to ‘Jack Layton’ became another chuckling point for many in the audience. I do understand the strategy of referencing Layton often, but it was far overdone. Layton is gaining more and more support as a leader, however we needed to hear more from Cindy, the citizen of Kitchener-Waterloo.
As for the Communist candidate, Ramon Portillo, he did a very good job, and should be conmmended for throwing his hat into the ring. There are obvious language barriers for him, and he had difficulty understanding a couple of questions, and difficulty delivering some answers. As Don stated above, he did deliver his overall message. More jobs, Fair trade not free trade, and more money to low earners.
Two other points. I already touched upon the ridiculously small room for the event, but also a problem with the location was that it was distinctly out of the way!! Way up at RIM Park, there really wasn’t a properly represented voice of the constituents (in my opinion).
Secondly, I was very disappointed with the rudeness of some of the audience. I am not talking about small remarks, chuckles, etc. I am talking about openly laughing at someone. Mr. Portillo deserved a great deal of respect for standing up in front of the audience, especially with the language barrier, but for members of the audience to be laughing at this was appalling! I had three Conservative supporters behind me (they made sure everyone knew) that were behaving in this manner. I am sure that there were supporters of most parties behaving in the same disrespectful way.
My short, and sweet opinion for you. okay, not short and sweet. Sorry
Leave a reply below or start a thread in the discussion forums
Note: Sometimes people try to portray more support for their candidate or their perspective in the comments section by posing as different people. If you attempt to do this, we will delete all of your comments.Update: despite the above warning, people are attempting to use multiple aliases, so we are now moderating all comments to check against possible abuses. We apologize for this inconvenience, however we will work to get comments posted as soon as possible.