14 October 2008
17 Sep
The battle in the riding of Hull-Aylmer seems to be being overlooked or grossly misrepresented. The Liberals are being very quiet, the Bloc Québécois is claiming they can win it, the Conservatives are saying it is possible they could win it, and then the NDP is claiming they are the real opponents for the Liberals.
 Hull-Aylmer is certainly up for grabs. The Liberals won the riding in 2006 with only a 1,785 vote margin. The Bloc Québécois finished second. It is interesting to note, however, that the Liberals lost more than 2,500 votes from their 2004 performance while the Bloc gained 162 votes. While the Bloc gain may not seem significant, it is actually far greater than it seems. In 2004, the Liberals had 33.9% of the vote in all of Quebec. In 2006, they had 20.7%, a reduction of 39% of their support. Marcel Proulx did better than the Liberals province-wide, managing to keep 87% of his vote from 2004.
 However, Bloc support in Quebec went from 48.9% in 2004 to 42.1% in 2006, a reduction of 14%, while support in Hull-Aylmer stayed constant, even increasing. The Bloc Québécois has a solid base in Hull-Aylmer, and though Bloc support provincewide will probably decrease by a few points on October 14, there is a good chance the Bloc vote will remain relatively stable here in Hull-Aylmer.
 The Liberals are seeing their provincial support decreasing even further into the high-teens. Marcel Proulx will feel the pinch, and if he loses only 10% of his support, he would be below the Bloc performance of 2006. The Conservatives and the NDP are fielding good candidates in the riding, and it is very possible that part of the Liberal and Bloc vote will bleed to these two parties. The question is whether it will bleed more from the Liberals or the Bloc. Considering the weakness of their leader and their campaign at the moment, it looks like the blood will be red.
 Raphaël Déry, the candidate for the Bloc in Hull-Aylmer, looks to gain from the problems in the Liberal campaign. The Conservatives, though they did increase their support significantly from 2004 to 2006, still finished over 8,000 votes behind the Liberals. Hull-Aylmer is an urban riding and has a long history of Liberal support – it is unlikely that the Conservatives will be able to make up that margin. As for the NDP, their confidence is bordering on the ludicrous. They are polling weakly in the province, and there isn’t any sort of orange wave appearing on the horizon. They finished over 9,000 votes behind the Liberals and will likely finish fourth on election day.
 It is true that more voters in Quebec are looking at the Conservatives and the NDP. But, any study of the riding will show that most of those voters won’t be Bloc supporters. At 29.37% in 2006, the Bloc reached its base level of sovereigntist support. It is a mistake to discount the issue of sovereignty in this election. It may not be the topic on everyone’s lips, but a good portion of the population (35%-42% depending on the poll) still support the sovereignty option, and sovereigntists rarely vote for anyone but the Bloc. In 1995, Hull voted 30.27% in favour of sovereignty. That base still exists, and it will be much harder to bleed support away from the Bloc – who has some of the most loyal supporters – than it will be from the Liberals, who are suffering everywhere.
 So, in short, Hull-Aylmer is up for grabs. But let’s be realistic: only one party has any chance of grabbing it away.Â

Conservative Party
Liberal Party
New Democratic Party
Bloc Québécois
Green Party
Christian Heritage
Progressive Canadian
Marijuana Party
Marxist-Leninist Party
Canadian Action Party
Communist Party
Libertarian Party
First Peoples Party
Western Block Party
Animal Alliance Party
neorhino.ca
16 Responses for "Hull-Aylmer – Up for Grabs?"
The NDP has the best chance of taking this riding. The Bloc will likely finish third. I’d bet my prestige on it.
Why on earth would you think that? There is no reason to believe the NDP has a chance.
I work in the riding, I’ve got to admit they certainly have a chance.
I live in the riding, and I can tell you they are a long shot.
Does anyone want to provide an argument as to why they do have a chance?
A geometric projection shows the NDP at a close second in hull given their current polling numbers. Add a star candidate and you have a victory.
Nick, I understand what you mean, but as I pointed out in my blog post, Hull-Aylmer doesn’t follow provincial trend lines. The Bloc should have lost votes in 2006 – it didn’t. The Liberals should have lost more votes in 2006 – they didn’t.
Increasing their support by almost twice as much would be one hell of a coup for the NDP, but you have to think that, like with the Greens in the rest of Canada, when voters get to the ballot box they’ll change their vote. Polls show that NDP supporters are among the most uncertain.
Would you bet against Mulcair, then?
Oof, that is a tough one. By-elections are so unlike general elections. But, unless the Liberal campaign turns itself around, I’d say Mulcair is safe.
2006 did not follow the trend. how about 2004? or 00, 97, and 93?
Have any of you hear Pierre Ducasse’s skills as an orator in both official languages? Have any of you heard how he speaks from the heart with passion?
This man is not just any typical brilliant candidate, he moved every single NDP member to remember why they vote that way during his run to become leader. Jack may have won the votes to become leader, but Pierre Ducasse won the hearts of all of us…
His candidacy and his ability to win in this riding should not be underestimated!
I think that Pierre Ducasse could be the strongest MP that Hull-Aylmer have had in my lifetime, maybe ever.
That’s a little much.
Not really, he is a far more dynamic personality and more responsive to those around him. I have had occasion to discuss issues with him and also have heard him speak on several occasions and have been impressed each time. I have also had the pleasure of meeting and speaking to the incumbent and several of his predecessors and although they have their strengths, there main attribute is being good “party” foot soldiers, not leaders. In my opinion Pierre is potentially a leader.
Of the other current candidates, the only other viable option is the BQ candidate – RAPHAËL DÉRY who I do not know, I have not been able to find much of substance about him. I have not seen his name in the press much commenting on issues other than criticizing the Liberals for abstaining. This is valid but not very inspired.
In this riding, the federalist vote far outweighs the sovereignist vote. If we are to elect a left leaning person who will be a strong voice for Quebec at the federal table, I thing Pierre is a better choice.
Your own blog this morning puts him just behind the liberals! http://sovereigntyenanglais.blogspot.com/
I know Raphaël, and he knows his stuff. Definitely more of a convictions person than a party person.
I look forward to the all candidates meetings
I think the federalist vote split might help the Bloc win here. Just like in Gatineau.
Leave a reply below or start a thread in the discussion forums
Note: Sometimes people try to portray more support for their candidate or their perspective in the comments section by posing as different people. If you attempt to do this, we will delete all of your comments.Update: despite the above warning, people are attempting to use multiple aliases, so we are now moderating all comments to check against possible abuses. We apologize for this inconvenience, however we will work to get comments posted as soon as possible.