14 October 2008
29 Sep
DemocraticSPACE doesn’t endorse strategic voting, and their strategic voting guide exists far more to tell the vast majority of people NOT to vote strategically than to convince skeptics to do it. But if you look at the data, there actually are a small handful of ridings in which voting for your second-choice candidate could help avoid electing your least favourite candidate.
Edmonton-Strathcona is one of those ridings.
The qualifications for the list are stringent. For a riding to make the list, all three of the following three things need to be true:
1. It must be a close 2-way race (i.e. the two competing parties must be within 5%)
2. The chances of a third/fourth/fifth party winning the riding are remote (i.e. current support for those parties must be less than ~20%)
3. A small number of votes from supporters of the third/fourth/fifth party can make a difference (i.e. fewer than 1 in 3 voters).
This means that according to democraticSPACE’s notoriously reliable mathematical model, fewer than 1 in 3 Liberals or Greens voting NDP in Edmonton-Strathcona could make the difference between a win for NDP candidate Linda Duncan and a win for Conservative candidate Rahim Jaffer.
When you can say something like that about a riding in Alberta, we’re definitely living in exciting times. And they say Canadian politics is boring!

Conservative Party
Liberal Party
New Democratic Party
Bloc Québécois
Green Party
Christian Heritage
Progressive Canadian
Marijuana Party
Marxist-Leninist Party
Canadian Action Party
Communist Party
Libertarian Party
First Peoples Party
Western Block Party
Animal Alliance Party
neorhino.ca
3 Responses for "Edmonton-Strathcona is on the democraticSPACE strategic voting guide"
What kind of strategic voting is Democratic Space pushing? I notice they are suggesting Conservatives vote strategically. What is the assumption there? The strategic voting I’m aware of is ABC motivated mostly for environmental reasons, although there are some other efforts (arts/culture, resources, etc.). Is your version issue based or does it assume all people with a given first choice share the same second choice or the same last choice?
Chuck,
Like I said, democraticSPACE isn’t “pushing” strategic voting at all. The guide exists mainly to deter people from voting “strategically” in ridings where it won’t make a difference anyway.
But have a look at the link, because your assumption is incorrect. There are many ridings in which Conservative could vote for his or her second choice and try to block his or her least favourite choice from winning. The reason why the discussion in this post is specifically about hypothetical Liberal and Green supporters voting strategically for the NDP is because this post is about Edmonton-Strathcona, and that’s what’s relevant there.
The NDP has always been strong in the core of Edmonton. It would not surprise me to see them win here.
Leave a reply below or start a thread in the discussion forums
Note: Sometimes people try to portray more support for their candidate or their perspective in the comments section by posing as different people. If you attempt to do this, we will delete all of your comments.Update: despite the above warning, people are attempting to use multiple aliases, so we are now moderating all comments to check against possible abuses. We apologize for this inconvenience, however we will work to get comments posted as soon as possible.