14 October 2008
14 Sep
The riding of Edmonton-Strathcona is a mostly urban riding with some suburban regions off to the south and east. It is one of the most diverse ridings in Alberta, as nearly 17% of the population are immigrants, and the riding is also home to most of Edmonton’s sizeable Francophone community. Its population is just shy of 100,000, and as with the rest of the province, it has been suffering the growing pains of being part of a boomtown.
Albertans have a well-deserved reputation for being politically apathetic, but as in so many other ways, Edmonton-Strathconans seem to be the exception. The riding had the highest voter turnout in the province in the 2006 federal election, weighing in at a whopping 70.6%. Of course, in part, this seems to have been because even then, there were signs of this riding being a real race:
2006 election results
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | Rahim Jaffer | 22,009 | 41.7% | +2.3% | |
| New Democrat | Linda Duncan | 17,153 | 32.5% | +8.7% | |
| Liberal | Andy Hladyshevsky | 9,391 | 17.8% | -11.2% | |
| Green | Cameron Wakefield | 3,139 | 5.9% | -0.6% | |
A glance at those results clearly suggests Edmonton-Strathcona is a classic case of the Conservatives only being able to win by exploiting the vote-splitting among the progressive parties. But a few factors make this riding more interesting than your typical “Conservative comes up the middle” riding. For one, in Edmonton-Strathcona, those votes are anything but evenly distributed throughout the riding. Support for the Conservatives, for example, is concentrated in the large, sparsely populated suburban polls off to the eastern and southern parts of the riding:
Conservative vote distribution 2006 
Support for the NDP, on the other hand, is concentrated in the smaller and more densely populated urban polls in the centre of the riding:
NDP vote distribution 2006 
Finally, support for the third-place Liberals is much more uniformly distributed across the riding:
Liberal vote distribution 2006 
The vote in the riding has also exhibited some interesting changes over time (the “Conservative” vote in this chart for the 1993-2000 elections pools the Reform and PC votes for the sake of comparison):
Vote change over time, 1993-2006

The Liberal vote has been going down in each election since 1993, while the NDP has gained each time, and in recent years, nearly in direct proportion to each Liberal decrease. Of particular note is the fact that the NDP was able to gain nine points in each of the 2004 and 2006 elections, while the Conservatives were only able to skim the fat off of the corresponding Liberal vote collapse. This suggests that while Liberal voters in Edmonton-Strathcona are willing to vote NDP, they are much more reluctant to turn Tory.
To further complicate matters, the riding is made up not just of the provincial constituency of Edmonton-Strathcona (currently held by New Democrat Rachel Notley), but also of parts of Edmonton-Gold Bar (currently held by Liberal Hugh MacDonald), parts of Edmonton-Riverview (currently held by Liberal Kevin Taft), and parts of Edmonton-Mill Creek (currently held by Alberta PC Gene Zwozdesky). What that translates to in terms of federal-level voting is anyone’s guess, but it certainly has an effect on where each of the parties are able to concentrate their respective volunteer bases.
Due to its unusual geographic, demographic, and partisan makeup, Edmonton-Strathcona has always been a fun riding for political junkies to watch. This time, though, the media and bloggers alike seem to be in agreement that it’s a “riding to watch” not just because of a particularly fascinating vote-splitting technique, but because it’s a rare Alberta riding that has a chance of changing hands in this election. Over the course of the next week, I’ll be talking about each of the four major local parties, their activity since the 2006 election, their nomination races, and the candidates they ultimately chose. Stay tuned.
Further reading:
Edmonton-Strathcona: the Conservatives
Edmonton-Strathcona: the New Democrats
Edmonton-Strathcona: the Liberals
Edmonton-Strathcona: the Greens

Conservative Party
Liberal Party
New Democratic Party
Bloc Québécois
Green Party
Christian Heritage
Progressive Canadian
Marijuana Party
Marxist-Leninist Party
Canadian Action Party
Communist Party
Libertarian Party
First Peoples Party
Western Block Party
Animal Alliance Party
neorhino.ca
17 Responses for "Edmonton-Strathcona: a snapshot"
This has got to be one ignorant blog. Not that I am native-born Alberta, I’m from Montreal, but to say Albertans are politically apathetic is just plain ignorant.
It was Albertans who have lead the successful change of policies that are now in place. When the Reform Party was founded, its policies of fiscal and social responsibilitity were quickly adopted by the Liberals and the Progressive Conservative Parties.
It is also ignorant to imply the Conservatives are doing anything underhanded because of the mutliple parties that form the political make up of the constituency.
Finally, you also imply there is something underhanded going on because there seems to be geographical factors of the voting. It sounds you want to play the age-old manipulation game of designing ridings to fit where NDP voters are. THAT is underhanded.
Jennie, try and be a little more objective as you analyse and ‘inform’!
I chose this blog because I was interested in the particular constituency. If this is an example of the quality that will be available during the election I have to tell you that it was a lot of work for pretty much nothing.
Stephen,
Can you point out precisely which words of mine “implied there is something underhanded going on”? Because I didn’t say that, nor do I think that. Nor did I say anything about wanting the riding boundaries to be “redesigned to fit where NDP voters are.” I think the current boundaries are hunky dory, thank you very much. I simply pointed out the fact that the uneven distribution of votes in the riding makes things more exciting.
Please don’t read things into what I say beyond the words I put on the page, and then accuse me of saying things that bear no resemblance to those words. It’s not very polite.
As for Albertans being politically apathetic, the fact that only 41.3% of the province’s population voted in the last provincial election got nationwide airplay, as in the National Post article I linked to: http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=353567 . I was simply pointing out that these kinds of results aren’t the case everywhere. If you want to argue that the rest of the province is equally gung-ho about elections, now, I’d love to hear your evidence, because I’d love to believe it, myself. It is my home, after all.
David,
Critique is fine. Generic negative comments with nothing constructive to say are…well, kind of pointless.
Wow Stephen, that’s a harsh comment.
I think the apathy comment comes from the fact that in the recent provincial election, our province demonstrated a 40% turnout. I would say that’s apathetic enough. The fact that a few extreme right-wing Albertans formed the Reform party and made gains here is apparent, but it’s not a guarantee that the existence of the Reform party caused the Chretien era government to be fiscally responsible (just look how Clinton in the States and the Labour party in Britain also followed the Third-Way economic models).
I also didn’t see where she implied anything underhanded. Also, this riding wasn’t drawn to fit all the Alberta NDPers in one region, but more likely the Whyte-Ave and University area drawed a liberal-arts crowd which votes with a social conscience.
Try to be a bit less of a Tory-Shill Stephen and maybe someone will take your “concerns” seriously.
It is only pointless if you think the point of criticism is to improve something. Sometimes the point of criticism is just to point out that something is kind of not very good.
I assume that you are writing this for the edification of those who you think should or will vote NDP. From that perspective I guess it might be of some value in once again ingraining fear or hatred of anything not in support of that position. I see little other value in it. It tells me nothing of the candidates, it simply once again repeats the ignorant and incorrect stereotype that only the fuzzy wuzzy left care about people. A mild form of hate speech, if you will, lacking in substance or truthfullness.
Does that help?
David,
Wow. I didn’t think I’d said anything about who cared about people at all. I thought I’d just posted a couple of charts and a couple of maps, and talked about some numbers that might tickle a political junkie or two. That’s certainly nothing to inspire “fear and hatred,” except maybe among those of us who are perhaps a tad phobic of numbers.
Wait a minute, I get it–my post must have been replaced by an entirely different one when I wasn’t looking! Mighty impressive, this democraticspace.com site, that it can do that and not even let the blog owner know. I sure wish I could read that post, myself, though; it sounds fascinating.
Thanks for doing all this research Jennie. The maps and numbers are really interesting. I’m not sure what lines David and Stephen are reading between, but there logic is twisted.
Hi Jennie. I agree with Chris. As someone who has lived in this riding (both in Gold Bar and near the University), I found the maps quite interesting.
Look forward to seeing how the riding plays out this time.
Great data from the 06 race — thanks for posting this, Jennie!
Just so you know, it would have been impossible to tell from your article which party you were from if it didn’t say NDP after your name. This is interesting and objective research. Having lived in this riding my whole life, and having voted for conservative, Liberal and NDP parties in various elections, depending on candidates and circumstances, I certainly find this data interesting. Many Albertans are apathetic (in voting terms, in case that wasn’t clear) because they feel their votes don’t make a difference. Federal elections are often decided before the polls in Edmonton close, and provincial politics has been a foregone conclusion for a while now. While your so-called “hate speach” (lol) makes me appreciate how important my vote could be in this election, it does not steer me towards any party in particular. Unfortunately, the ludicrously defensive comments posted earlier do. It frightens me that these people are partisan to the extent that their basic analytical and reading comprehension abilities go out the window. This is an article about electoral demographics and voting patterns guys. If I were a Conservative, this article would make me realize that this seat is at risk. I would then try and convince people towards my point of view with real arguments, not scare them away with demagogic inanities. Jennie, as an undecided voter, I am really looking forward to more articles.
Garrett,
Thanks so much! It’s true, I am a New Democrat, but even more than that, I’m a political junkie who looooooves data, and who thinks Edmonton-Strathcona has always been a much more fascinating riding than anybody’s given it credit for. Even before it had a chance in hell of changing hands, it was still one of the more interesting Canadian ridings, I think.
As for the next one, I’m going to try to get it up tonight. No promises because I do have a day job, but I’ll do my best.
Chris, Matt, Dave,
Thanks!
Really interesting post, and very informative. Thanks for taking the time to go into all this stuff for everyone Jennie!
[...] Liberals’ vote had been inching down over each of the four elections prior to 2006, but in that year it took a much deeper dive of eleven points. This made the nomination process [...]
[...] the NDP, the Edmonton-Strathcona results weren’t good enough to win in 2006, but they were still a milestone. For one, it was the best showing the party’s ever had in the riding. But even more [...]
[...] in the two ridings that the Conservatives are most concerned about holding onto this election: Edmonton-Strathcona (which the Conservatives could lose to NDP candidate Linda Duncan) and Edmonton Centre (which the [...]
[...] are problematic, let’s have a look at the actual evidence. First, there’s the data about past elections that suggests that if trends continue the way they have in 2004 and 2006, Duncan can actually win [...]
[...] 1, 2008 · No Comments Description of the [...]
Leave a reply below or start a thread in the discussion forums
Note: Sometimes people try to portray more support for their candidate or their perspective in the comments section by posing as different people. If you attempt to do this, we will delete all of your comments.Update: despite the above warning, people are attempting to use multiple aliases, so we are now moderating all comments to check against possible abuses. We apologize for this inconvenience, however we will work to get comments posted as soon as possible.